Some Scholars on the King James

Some scholars opinions on the King James...

Introduction to Biblical Interpretation by Klein, Blomberg and Hubbard on the KJV:

Summary of what they say about the KJV:

Though the translators did their best for 1611, many of the Greek texts they used were from the same area. Since then, a wider spread of texts and ones closer in date to the time of the original authors have been found. It is generally accepted that things closer to the date they happened are more accurate, so having earlier manuscripts should influence how we translate the Bible.

Would they recommend the KJV/NKJV as Bible scholars?

"We really ought to be thankful, for example, that Mark did not write the KJV rendering of Mark 16:18, but readers who limit themselves to the KJV will never know this. Readers of the NKJV will know the differences among manuscripts, if they read the footnotes, but they will naturally conclude that the better readings are those of the KJV. For this reason we cannot endorse the widespread use of these versions when alternatives are available." (120)

How to Read the Bible for all its Worth, Fee and Stuart:

"The KJV for a long time was the most widely used translation in the world; it is also a classic expression of the English language. Indeed, it coined phrases that will forever be embedded in our language ("coals of fire," "the skin of my teeth," "tongues of fire,"). However, for the New Testament, the only Greek text available to the 1611 translators was based on late manuscripts, which had accumulated the mistakes of over a thousand years of copying. Few of these mistakes- and we must note that there are many of them- make any difference to us doctrinally, but they often do make a difference in the meaning of certain specific texts. Recognising the English of the KJV was no longer a living language- and thoroughly dissatisfied with its modern revision (RSV/NRSV)- it was decided by some to "update" the KJV by ridding it of its "archaic" way of speaking. But in doing so, the NKJV revisers eliminated the best feature of the KJV (its marvelous expression of the English language) and kept the worst (its flawed text).

This is why for study you should use almost any modern translation rather than the KJV or the NKJV." (40)

Grasping God's Word Duvall and Hays:

They note a prominent scholar of the day wasn't happy with the translation saying:

"Tell his majesty that I would rather be rent in pieces by wild horses, than any such translation by my consent should be urged upon poor churches. The new edition crosseth me. I require it to be burnt." (Dr. Hugh Broughton, cited 162) I know nothing more about him but he's presented in the book as being against it not on religious grounds but scholarly ones. 

"The King James Version was a good translation for the early 1600s since it was written in the English of the early 1600s. Today, however, most of us would have trouble even reading a page of the original 1611 version, since it was printed in Archaic English.

"To argue that we should still use the 1769 KJV edition (the one that is popular today) is to admit the necessity of revising a translation. This is the case since there have been thousands of changes from 1611 to 1769; they are literally two different bibles. Why not continue the process of revision by drawing on the latest in biblical scholarship and using language that today's readers can understand? Anything less seems to violate the intent of those who translated the original King James Version." (164) 

Of the four bible study/interpretation books I found in the CCBC library, only Andy Deane's (a Calvary Chapel guy) recommended the King James as one Bible to use (but even he says you need to compare any Bible translation you choose as your main translation to others to get a full understanding of Scripture)

Grace and Buffy the Vampire Slayer (RBIS)

Yeah, I know, a blog about Buffy, I'm surprised this is about Buffy too.

So, recently I have been reading about, and learning from, and realising the importance of, God's grace. And, as many of you will know, I love seeing Christianity in popular culture. I have previously written a blog on God as seen in Buffy the Vampire Slayer as being one of the reasons I really love the show. If you want to you can read that here.
In that blog I talk a little about an episode in season 4 where Faith (as Buffy) stops some vampires that are taunting God after taking a church hostage. That episode left a big impression on me (I was maybe 9 or 10 when I first saw it). I even visited the church because it's not too far from Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, CA.

Anyway... flash back to now. I'm wondering and thinking about grace in popular culture, and my brain is finding it really hard to find any good examples. Sure, there are examples of forgiveness, thanksgiving, mercy and love in popular culture, but grace... where is grace?

I've been thinking about this for awhile but today my brain hit on something...
Buffy was a show of seven seasons (running from 1997-2003). Season six is almost universally the most hated by Buffy fans. It probably contributed for Sarah's decision to quit playing Buffy as she constantly complained that the new show runners were taking the character of Buffy in a direction that Sarah, having played Buffy for five years at that point, didn't agree with and believed she wouldn't do.

So, at the end of this awful season is the best picture of grace I have seen in popular culture. I hadn't even considered it, because it's a bad season!

Previously on Buffy the Vampire Slayer:
Willow, Buffy's best friend, has become addicted to magic. She attempts to give it up earlier in the season, but then her girlfriend is shot and killed in an attempt to kill Buffy. Willow's grief consumes her and she gives in to her addiction, finding all the magic she can in order to kill the three people responsible (or partially responsible by association) for Tara's death. She is basically Evil Willow (or Dark Witch Willow as the toy of her is called).

Where sin abounds?
So, Willow has gone dark. She has killed Warren, the guy who shot the gun, and she is after the other two. Buffy tries to stop her, and she beats Buffy up, turning against those she loves and who love her in order to get what she wants, in order to fulfil her desire for revenge.

Enter Jesus character No. 1
Giles, Buffy's former mentor, returns imbued with the magic of love (not really called this in the show, but hinted at when it states Willow's power is from a place of grief, pain and vengeance, while Giles' power is from 'the true source of magic'). Giles faces off against Willow, weakening her. He convinces her that she needs to steal his power to be the most powerful, so she does.
Taking Giles' powers weakens him, and he knows he is going to die. His plan was to sacrifice his own life in order to give Willow the good magic, that it might just spark something inside her.

However, Giles' plan doesn't exactly work out. (Unlike actual Jesus who saved us by His finished work on the cross). Willow now has more power than any other mortal has ever had, and she has this added compassion to all her grief power. She feels the grief and pain of the entire world and decides to end the world.

Enter Jesus character No. 2
Willow traps Buffy and her sister Dawn in a bit facing what are sort of like tiny Ents from Lord of the Rings. Root-Ents. So Buffy cannot help.
Instead, Xander, the powerless one of the group, the only one without magic, or teleportation, or enhanced strength etc. comes to face Willow.

Willow has raised this Satanic Temple and is channelling the essence of the earth (I'm guessing) through her and into it. Xander steps in the way and the line is broken.
Willow blasts him out of the way, but he gets back up, breaking the line again.

Xander tells Willow that she is his best friend, and if the world is about to end there is nowhere he would rather be than by the side of his best friend.
She strikes him with her power again. He tells her a story of how she broke a yellow crayon on their first day of school, and how he loved her then, and loves her now in all her black magic power.

She blasts him again, causing gashes to appear in his shirt and on his body.

He tells her he loves her and begins to take steps towards her, repeating that he loves her with every step and every strike.

By the time he is within arms reach she cannot use her powers anymore and is in tears, she hits him, not like a powerful witch but like a scared young girl in her twenties dealing with grief. She collapses into his arms and her hair, which was black as she was evil, becomes its natural red again.

Giles' sacrifice to implant love in Willow, and Xander standing in the way, taking a beating to show how much he loves her, saves the day... and saves Willow too who becomes a full member of the group after some time in England rehabilitating in season seven.

Comparisons to God's grace:
It's hard not to see the parallels with God and His grace there. I cannot believe I missed it for so long.
Giles is willing to die to give the one committing evil a chance at love and to reenter relationship.
Xander is punished for Willow, in order to keep telling her he loves her.
Finally, relationship is restored and Willow joins the team and her friends forgiven, accepted and loved. In the end, the power from love proves to be more powerful than the power of grief and pain, as Willow will be one of the key players that helps save and change the world in the next season.

"Where sin abounds, grace abounds all the more."

The episode even has a song as Willow falls into Xander's arm, that as I rewatched I noticed was very Christian. It is the Prayer of St. Francis, sung by Sarah McLachlan.

And, if you want to see the best example of grace I've seen in popular culture, you can see it here.

Dublin and Palestine

This is old news, and I'm sorry if you already don't care, but I've been meaning to stick up a blog on this, so here it is.

On the 11th of May 2017 an approved motion of Dublin City Council was put into effect. The motion was to fly the Palestinian flag above Dublin City Hall for one month to mark the fifty-year anniversary of the occupation of the West Bank by Israeli forces.

Ireland has a long tradition of supporting countries like us, countries dominated and oppressed by a larger, more powerful, neighbouring nation.
The suffering and death of innocent lives is never good, no one denies that. However, Ireland has no right to do anything like this.

That's because Ireland is a NEUTRAL country.

Neutrality, by its very nature, means not taking a side in an international conflict.

Palestine-Israel is the definition of an international conflict.

Dublin City Council's decision to fly the Palestinian flag for the monty of May, and into June, indirectly violates the Irish principal of neutrality.

If we value neutrality as much as we attest to, if we want to avoid entering into international conflicts, we need to be wise about what we do. Whether people personally feel they should support Palestine or Israel is up to them, but Ireland and her political entities should never enter into taking a side in this conflict.

The principle of neutrality should mean we fly an Israeli flag as well.

I was heartened to see that the former Justice Minister, Alan Shatter, condemned the move.

Sadly I must criticise President Higgins, the protector of the constitution in which Irish neutrality is legally defined and enshrined, should have vetoed this move as it was not in the best interest of the country and paints a bad light on Ireland, and certainly on Dublin!

Seriously England

So, for those of you who do not follow English politics let me give you a brief history before my rant about the sorts of images appearing in English newspapers recently. Scroll to the image if you know the background.

Brexit happened, you probably remember that. It was when the UK voted to leave the European Union. The Prime Minister (PM) at the time was David Cameron, the leader of the conservative (Tory) party. He stepped down as he was not pro-Brexit and Theresa May took his place, becoming the UKs second female PM.
As part of Brexit, Britain need to enter into negotiations with the other 27 member states of the European Union to flesh out with a post-EU relationship will look like for Britain.
May wanted a clearer mandate and called a snap general election, hoping to return a strong majority for her Tory party. She was returned as PM, but she did not get that clear majority, and so clear mandate, she hoped the election would provide.

In order to form a government, May needed the support of a smaller party. Enter Northern Ireland.
The North, for those who don't know, is still controlled by the UK (and because they cannot come to agreements with their parliament in Stormont, they could go to being directly ruled by Westminster in London again, which would not be good for the Good Friday Agreement and peace in the region between pro-British factions and pro-Republic of Ireland factions.

Anyway, the DUP, a Unionist or pro-British party, won ten seats in the election in the North. Sinn Féin, the pro-Republic party, won 7 but they abstain from taking them as they don't recognise the authority of Westminster in Irish affairs.

So, to stay PM and form a government that could work, May formed an alliance with the DUP, a party on pretty much no Englishman's radar. So newspaper political cartoons came out, and they have been ridiculously racist.

Here is one example published in the Daily Mail and I want to discuss why it is wrong, not helpful and should be retracted.

Here's the image:

This really offends me. I have grown up in a good period of history and camaraderie between the UK and Ireland, with our two states officially recognising the existence and validity of the other, with Queen Elizabeth IIs state visit to Ireland, followed by Michael D.'s state visit to the UK (that moment the Irish national anthem played out in Windsor Castle will never leave my memory). Everything was so hopeful, and then this.

800 years of dominion and oppression. 800 years of being treated as less than human. The British Government enslaved Irish people, deported them to work in their colonies in the Americas and Australia. They watched us die in the famine as they exported food that could have saved lives. They depicted us as monkeys, apes and drunks. Finally things were beginning to heal. But then this.

This image, and images like it appearing in papers in the UK right now, show the old Irish stereotypes are still strong in the UK, because this image shows zero understanding of Northern Ireland and uses the stereotypical image of the Republic instead.

The DUP are a Protestant, pro-British, largely Evangelical group. This means that:

1. Large numbers of them do not drink alcohol due to their Christian beliefs.

2. They do not consider themselves Irish and therefore would not choose an Irish beverage to be the thing they agree to government to get.

3. They do not lie around drunk when they should be helping govern their country.

It's a sad step in the wrong direction at such a volatile time in Anglo-Irish relations, and when the issue of Northern Ireland is a key one in Brexit negotiations as the border between the Republic and the North will be the only land border into the European Union affected by Brexit.

Britain, we have forgiven a lot in Ireland (we remind you guys of all you did a lot, because your history books teach you that you had a great civilising Empire that admittedly made some mistakes but was generally celebrated), but we look to a future of friendship, not to a past of hate; it's time to grow up and stop dehumanizing the people you probably share the most in common with on earth.

PS: we drink more tea than you!

The Room of Your Deepest Dreams

So I was reading a book recently and in it the author discussed this old movie. The movie is set in a bleak, dystopian future where hope is dying. However, there is a place where there is a room. This room fulfils/grants the deepest desires of anyone who walks into it.

Three friends, a writer, a professor and a stalker (I have no idea if that is a job, or if this character has a creepy desire to get the person they have been stalking from the room) set off in search of the room of deepest desires.

They each have an idea of what that room will give them when they get there, it is these they set out after, and it is these desires they are pursuing.

Throughout the course of the movie, I'm totally assuming, the trio encounter things that expend their knowledge of themselves. It's one of those movies, they reach the room but then they hesitate, they don't go in. Why not? Perhaps the things they set off in search of are not the things they actually deeply desire. Perhaps the things they thought they knew about themselves as they set out on their quest are not the things they know about themselves at the end. Perhaps those deepest desires they set out in search of are not actually their deepest desires at all.

This got me thinking, and I think it is a good question to ask, what do you think the room would give you if you arrived there?

Now, the last blog I wrote I was told was good because of how honest I am in my blogs. I am sorry to disappoint you in this one, I will not be telling you about what I think the room would grant me.
In my head, however, I divided these thoughts into two: things I hope the room would give me, which I have no problem sharing, and things I fear the room would give me, which I will not share!

The things I hope the room would give me, the things I hope are my deepest desires, are a church group, building and finances to pastor and tell about the love and grace and work of Christ for them; a wife; the success of the books I write; and, eventually, the Presidency of Ireland because I am an idealist and have ideas that I think could make our little patch of land a nicer place to live.

I hope those desires and motives are my deepest, but I certainly wondered on hearing the story of the three friends and their room. You don't need to tell me, but what do you hope and fear the room would give you if you went in?

I'm gonna be praying that the things I hope, and not the things I fear are actually, or would become, my deepest desires!

Calvary Chapel Pastor's Conference

So this past week I was at the majority of the Calvary Chapel Pastor's Conference in Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa. Here is a bit of what I experienced and what I thought of the conference.

Monday:
I arrived at the conference and came to the registration line where Brian Brodersen was standing.

Brian Brodersen, for those of you who do not know, is the lead pastor of Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa, the successor of Chuck Smith, the founder of the Calvary Chapel movement of churches. As such, Brian is also the head of the entire Calvary Chapel movement (or the half that identify with the Calvary Global Network at least). So it was certainly a blessing to meet him, let him know who I was and finally meet him and speak to one another in person.

The first session of the conference was led by Brian. He spoke of the Calvary Movement and what he loved and what he saw going forward. It was a great session and very encouraging to hear the direction Pastor Brian sees the Calvary movement going in, that is a theme for the conference, the future of our little movement of churches is certainly looking bright, even with the recent hardships within it.

After the first couple of sessions I found Mike Neglia, who was going to skip on dinner to study for his workshop the next day. I decided I should try the shop across the street for something Mike could eat whenever he had time. On my way, a car pulled up and Clay (formerly pastor of Calvary Waterford, and now Calvary Tri Valley in NorCal) asked me if I wanted to join them for food. After a couple of seconds of humming and hawing I decided to go and got into the car to see Brian Brodersen was the driver and his son, Char was there too. So I got to go have dinner with Brian the first day of meeting him. I'm not like the Quinity is Father, Son, Spirit, Chuck Smith and Brian Brodersen here or anything, it was just cool.

So with the guys we talked about Ireland, my future there, Clay's time there, Brian used to pastor in Westminster, so we talked about the differences between Europe and America in how people think and in ministry. It was just a blessing. Plus, they were already on a mission to get Mike food! So it worked out very well!

After all the conference activities were done I went back to stay with a lady, called Donna, who works in the church there. She lives with someone who works in the school of worship at Costa Mesa too. So, Donna and I shared some of our life stories and it was just such a blessing to get to know her and the life God has walked with her through.

Tuesday:
On Tuesday the stand out moment was certainly Christopher Yuan's workshop on how Christians should approach speaking to homosexual people. Christopher is himself someone who gay and now isn't living that life anymore. What an amazing time listening to how he has thought about how to talk to people and how clearly he presented it. What a blessing to the church!!

The other stand out moment was Paul David Tripp speaking in the main session. Knowing he would be there inspired me to read some of his books. We had one Instruments in the Redeemer's Hands in the CCBC library, so I read that first, then I bought Dangerous Calling from the CCBC bookstore, because it deals specifically with pastoral ministry. It was some of the content of this book that Tripp spoke on and it was so good!

Wednesday:
Wednesday is the crazy day. Wednesday morning at around 7:20am the police in Costa Mesa found Mike Neglia after he had been hit by a car. The car was travelling 45 mph and he was thrown 30 feet. It is a miracle he is alive.
Thus began one of the longest, most tense days of my life. Clay and Char were with Mike, and later Joy (from Calvary Cork) joined them. They relayed news to us, which Brian relayed to the conference at large. We waited for hours to learn that Mike was not paralysed. Then we waited hours more to hear his bones were okay, having previously heard he had a broken neck and two spinal fractures. God really had his hand on Mike, but it was certainly a tense day.

My brain didn't focus too much on the conference that day, until the news of Mike being well came in. Instead of sitting in sessions I hung out with Kellen and George, who are friends of Mike's and certainly have become friends of mine. They work for Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa, and they as well as Britt, Josh, Matthew and some others were doing the live streaming of the conference, recording it and filming interviews and things. Seeing as film is a big interest in mine it was so great to be able to sit and observe and sometimes adjust cameras and little things like that, with them.
Wednesday we ate ribs together and it was great!

On Wednesday I also met John Henry. Back in the 80s John used to get Chuck's sermons sent to him in Tipperary. After some communication with Papa Chuck, Chuck invited him to Costa Mesa for a year. John never left. It was so good to get to sit with him and talk with him. He stayed in America because of his love for Chuck, and that was beautiful. I was talking to him about Mike and the possibility of my returning to Ireland to help Calvary Cork for a bit until Mike recovers, and he told me about how he did similar things with Chuck. I later learned that Chuck has circulation problems with his legs and John Henry used to massage them, often and for a long time, and if he hadn't done this Pastor Chuck could have died a number of years before he did. What a beautiful servant of God, helping Chuck to succeed in ministry by taking care of his physical and some administrative needs! We spoke about me planting a church, and the feeling I have of where the Lord is leading and the journey that I was on in coming to that place where, with confidence I can say exactly where it is (the middle of a blog post is not the place to announce that if you don't already know from personal conversations with me).
We also spoke of his time in Ireland and the joy he has in seeing the continuing of the Calvary movement there. All in all it was just such a great conversation!

At the last session, just before Christopher Yuan spoke, Brian announced the results of Mike's tests, there is a video on my instagram (@WaveyCowpar) if you want to see it. There are also pictures of some of the speakers and a paraphrase of a quote they said, because I often cannot remember the exact quotes!

Thursday:
Thursday I went straight to the live streaming area. I hung out with George mostly, and prayed for Kellen's stress levels. Then, at lunch time, some of those guys were heading to film three episodes (again there is a picture on my instagram). So I got to see the Calvary TV studios and the equipment they use to film. My goal is to have a Calvary Church that undertakes similar projects, because film is such a big part of my life!
It was great to see the studio and listen to Brian interviewing three wonderful people, Efram, who is a pastor in London and once a member of Brian's own church there; David Guzik, who's just a genius and a very gracious and humble man, and Lu Wing, who is writing one of the most interesting titles I've heard, but it sounds like it will be so good!

All in all, the conference was so good, and speakers really inspired the pastors present to look to the future by being informed of our past and the work of Pastor Chuck. Especially blessing was Johnathan Domingo talking about the example of how Chuck delegated ministry responsibility allowed Calvary to fail at times, but ultimately to grow and be the influence it was in the early days and is now in Mexico. It was also great to meet lots of different people, and to finally meet Brian and see the human behind the image!

Please continue to pray for Brian Brodersen as he leads and directs the Calvary movement and is pastor at Costa Mesa, there were times my heart went out to him, its a lot of weight to carry especially with all that's happening in the Calvary movement today!
Pray also for Mike's recovery, and for Rachel, Eoin and Rosie, and for Calvary Cork as they function without Mike!